Latest News

LAUSD removes affirm and respect gender identity pledge

Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) has reportedly removed explicit wording that required educators to “affirm and respect” student gender identities from its annual PRISM training questionnaire, according to reporting and materials released by Liberty Counsel. The LAUSD ‘affirm and respect’ gender identity pledge language was, Liberty Counsel says, changed two days after the group sent a demand letter on June 8.

Fox News reported the revision and linked the Liberty Counsel materials. The organization says the district replaced the earlier prompt with a simpler checkbox asking staff to confirm awareness of district nondiscrimination policies. Those descriptions and the timeline come from Liberty Counsel and the cited reporting; they have not been independently verified by a district statement in the coverage cited.

What changed

Liberty Counsel says the original PRISM training questionnaire included a line teachers were asked to acknowledge: “I am aware that LAUSD policy requires me to affirm and respect the identities of all students, including those who identify as LGBTQ+.” In its June 8 demand letter, the group argued that language improperly compelled employees to make statements contrary to their religious beliefs.

According to Liberty Counsel, LAUSD modified the questionnaire two days later to remove the phrase “affirm and respect” and to instead ask staff to confirm they are aware of the district’s nondiscrimination rules. Fox News’ story cites the demand letter and the Liberty Counsel account for its timeline.

LAUSD ‘affirm and respect’ gender identity pledge change

Liberty Counsel circulated statements from two teachers described as sixth-grade LAUSD educators who said they felt relief after the wording was changed. One teacher, quoted by Liberty Counsel, said they had feared job loss over the original prompt and called the revision a “victory for religious liberty.” Those quotes and the teacher accounts are released by Liberty Counsel and presented in the group’s materials.

Mat Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel, is quoted in the group’s release framing the revision as protection under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. That is Liberty Counsel’s legal interpretation; the claim that the prompt violated Title VII is an assertion by the organization and has not been decided by a court in this matter.

How state training works and what PRISM covers

PRISM is the online cultural competency module tied to California’s Safe and Supportive Schools Act. The California Department of Education (CDE) describes the program as part of the state’s effort to ensure schools provide supportive environments for LGBTQ students. Under state rules, middle and high school teachers must complete annual training that includes the PRISM module, the CDE says.

The CDE has previously identified partners involved in developing PRISM content, including organizations such as The Trevor Project and the Human Rights Campaign. The agency’s materials outline the training’s focus on student safety and nondiscrimination; specifics about local implementation and questionnaire wording are handled at the district level, the CDE statement indicates.

What this means for teachers and next steps

At present, the most concrete change reported is a revision to the questionnaire’s wording in the PRISM training module used by LAUSD, per the Liberty Counsel materials and news reporting. That appears to narrow an affirmative obligation into a confirmation of awareness of existing nondiscrimination rules, according to the accounts circulated by the group.

LAUSD did not provide a separate, on-the-record statement in the coverage cited; Fox News reported the district “did not immediately respond” to requests for comment. Because the reporting relies heavily on Liberty Counsel’s materials, readers should note the distinction between the organization’s assertions and independent district policy statements or court findings.

Observers and educators should watch for any formal district communication or filing that clarifies whether the change is a temporary edit to training language, a districtwide policy adjustment, or part of a broader review. If Liberty Counsel or other parties pursue litigation, court filings would offer a definitive legal record of any Title VII claim related to training language.

FAQ

Did LAUSD remove the affirm and respect requirement from training?

Liberty Counsel reports that LAUSD modified the PRISM questionnaire two days after receiving a June 8 demand letter, removing the phrase “affirm and respect” and asking teachers to confirm awareness of district nondiscrimination policies. The district has not issued a separate, on-the-record explanation in the reporting cited.

What legal argument did Liberty Counsel use?

Liberty Counsel argues the prompt could violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by compelling employees to act contrary to their religious beliefs. That is the group’s legal assertion; no court ruling on that claim in this matter is cited in the reporting.

What state rules require LGBTQ training for teachers?

California’s Safe and Supportive Schools Act requires annual cultural competency training for middle and high school teachers. The California Department of Education lists PRISM as the online course developed with external partners and says teachers must complete an hour of this training each year.

Source: This article is based on reporting by Fox News and on documents and statements released by Liberty Counsel, with background from the California Department of Education. Original reporting: Fox News. For state guidance on PRISM and training requirements, see the California Department of Education: CDE press release.

Risk note: The timeline, quotes and legal claims in this article rely largely on statements and documents released by Liberty Counsel and reporting by Fox News. Those elements are presented as the organization’s assertions and have not been independently validated by court rulings or a formal district statement in the cited coverage.